Today in EWRT 1A, after editing our own/each other's essays--Victoria's of which was absolutely fabulous--we discussed Persepolis. I loved hearing what everyone had to say! Most people were very surprised at how Marjane was so sure of what she wanted. I realized that I don't even know my passions yet, which makes Marjane's personality so incredible. Then again, I may have been as confident as she when I was ten. Like Michael Franti's song, "Say Hey"
They also admired how supportive Marjane's parents are, which I noticed while reading the book, too! It was so enlightening to see that not everyone in Iran is so closed minded and extreme. So it was an enjoyable class period since I got to hear everyone's thoughts :)
Goodbye!
Angie :)
I think Sophism refers to people who studied rhetoric in order to manipulate people. They often argued for the fun of it, or for the money. I guess lawyers could be considered sophists.
Why should they have to finish their essay if there is no point of getting a grade? Why put in effort into anything? Sure you could say that they should do it to get good grades to get a good degree to get a good job. But all these "good"s are notions set up by society.
Why should they have to follow society? Who needs acceptance and approval? People can do whatever the heck they want if they don't need other people to accept them.
Anyway, I did actually read a few sentences on Hegel from Wikipedia. Apparently, he had to hide his atheism to stay employed. This religion business is so ridiculous. Some people just make up some absurd teachings and say everyone has to live by the same rules. Well, that's all well and good if these rules are merely to keep a society functioning smoothly, but if they are things like, "women can't show any part of their body" or "parents should decide their children's lives for them," then people are just blind. What has the world come to? Are people so unintelligent as to not see how unhappy they are? Knowing that you're unahppy doesn't even require intelligence! Okay, so maybe it's not the fault of those in oppressed countries who continue their traditional ways of killing themselves inside. Is there really just no hope for these people?
At least Prof. Patton went a little deeper into Marx's idea of dialectical materialism. She reviewed Marx's idea of the workers overthrowing the government and synthesizing to create a new system. So she compared this to writing, where new ideas come from taking the thesis and the antithesis, then synthesizing them. I thought it was all very interesting.
You know, communism is very practical in theory, but people are just too greedy to make it work. If people hadn't evolved to want everything for themselves, then we could be living in an utopia. But of course, this isn't possible with the fight for survival still in our DNA. Man, evolution just gets in the way of peaceful living, doesn't it?
Deb.
No comments:
Post a Comment